To:         devnull@hitech.k9.com (Hitech Simulation Mailing list)
From:       devnull@hitech.k9.com (Hitech Simulation Mailing list)
Reply-To:   devnull@hitech.k9.com (Hitech Simulation Mailing list)
Sender:     devnull@hitech.k9.com (Hitech Simulation Mailing list)
Return-Path: devnull@hitech.k9.com (Hitech Simulation Mailing list)
Errors-To:  postmaster@hitech.k9.com
Precedence: bulk
Bcc:        hitech-sim-out
Subject: Hitech Simulation Digest V3 : I33


Hitech Simulation Digest Volume 3 : Issue 33
               Tue Nov 21 23:20:45 PST 1995
   Compilation copyright (C) 1995  Jeff Beadles
   Send submissions to "hitech-sim@hitech.k9.com"
   Send add/drop requests to "majordomo@hitech.k9.com"
   Archives are available via ftp from cactus.org

 Today's Topics:
  Re: Su-27 Flanker - Win95 only       opus@ihlpf.att.com                 
  EF2000                               "Christer Johansson" <cj@algonet.se

------------------------------------------------------------
From: opus@ihlpf.att.com
Subject: Re: Su-27 Flanker - Win95 only

bruce@east.opticalres.com writes:

>I just read the very interesting post on EF2000 -- looks like the modern
>combat sim of my dreams, but we shall wait to see when and with what it
>actually ships.

Except someone posted that in a demo he tried, cutting throttle to idle
allowed him to glide almost forever even with a heavy weapons load.  Uh oh...

>In this regard, I just read a bunch of posts on the similarly hyped ultra-
>realistic Su-27 Flanker sim,
>
>Posts in SSI's area on AOL indicate that the product shipped the other day,
>but with a lot of promised features missing.  In particular, the shipped
>version is Win95 only, while hype had indicated the CD would contain several
>executables optimized for different situations (Win95, DOS/fast, DOS/slower 
>CPU).

The later net postings by the Mindscape rep made it clear the first
version released would be Win95 only.

>Oh yes -- they forgot to include a key for checking your six o'clock!   

They don't consider this an omission.  Looking at the scanned photos I
have of the Su-27, I'd say it must have really poor rearward visibility,
but I still doubt it's as bad as in the demo.  I have not tried the
released version.

Rob
opus@ihlpf.att.com

-------------------------------

From: "Christer Johansson" <cj@algonet.se>
Subject: EF2000

Hi,

>I just read the very interesting post on EF2000 -- looks like the modern
>combat sim of my dreams, but we shall wait to see when and with what it
>actually ships.

Some lucky guys in UK have it already and we will make our way all 
the way up to Stockholm (Sweden) on friday to get it fresh from
the custom ;-)...

Here is what he wrote on C$S today...

>Hi folks,
>
>Thanks to a terrific special offer to ELO! subscribers, 
>I now have my hands on one of the very first copies of EF2000!!!
>And just like the special offer, it looks pretty neat.  
>Now I have another mammoth manual to read (this one is 286 pages!)
>
>Mike.

So this weekend will probably decide if we at 104:th ETFW will
put Falcon 3.0X on the self.

Regards,

/Christer

-------------------------------


[[ End of digest  Volume 3 : Issue 33 ]]
